Peer Review Policy

We at TMR believe that peer review is an essential part of maintaining substantial standards in publishing and brings out the best possible scientific novel information from potential authors and researchers globally.

Peer Review Process:

All journals of TMR use double blind peer review system to ensure originality, timeliness, relevance, and readability. There is a great deal of information out there on scientific topics. However, whether it can be trusted or not is a key issue at present. The main question that often emerges in this aspect is about the review process adopted to screen the articles for publication. One of the most acceptable and proven process adopted in majority reputed international journals is peer-reviewing.

Benefits of Peer-Review:

  • Establishes the legitimacy of exploration based upon the expert information of different specialists in the order, consequently averting adulterated work from being acknowledged within an area of study.
  • It provides significant criticism with the intention that scientists can revise and enhance their papers before publication.
  • Enables Journal editors to select the most important research findings for publication in their journals, based upon the subject, independent reviews of an expert group.
  • The process of peer review is comprehended and acknowledged by the majority of researchers. The forum includes experts, those who have a common area of interest, expertise, and experience to evaluate the work to be published. The reviewers will be given priority utmost to reflect the appraisals of research work and to extract the potentialities of the researcher.

The peer-review process is done by esteemed reviewers with an in-depth knowledge of the specialized discipline and purpose of the process. In order to encourage maximum participation from part of the reviewers, scientific credits will be provided based on the number of manuscripts handled and the exemplary timelines by the authors.
The open journal system will be used for peer-review of scientific journals to meet the criteria of an international editorial manager system. This provides greater flexibility and degree of transparency at each level, with respect to the authors, editors, and reviewers respectively. The standard peer review process is also essential from the perspective of editorial board members, who take the responsibility in shaping the open access articles to meet the international standards of open access journals.

Peer-reviewed articles are assessed and critiqued by the scientists and experts in the same field after the article is distributed for review. An author is expected to incorporate the suggested changes prior to publication. This process enriches the content and improves the quality of the presentation considerably.