How the Firm networks Affect the foundation and development of NTBF: Empirical evidence on the Propositions of Hite and Hesterly
Keywords:
Firm networks, New Technology Based Firms (NTBFs)Abstract
Network has drawn attention from different fields and its contributions on the businesses have been discussed; however, Hite and Hesterly (2001) propose that it is significant for companies to change from closed networks to dispersed networks as the firm grows. Similarly, scholars argue that firm network, development and resources are “co-evolved”. These authors further state that changing of networks are affected by (a) individual difference of entrepreneurs, (b) industrial differences for resources, and (c) difference in the compositional quality. Thus, this paper tests their propositions to see “why” it is essential to change networks and to pinpoint “what”, “when” and “how” the necessity is needed in the formation and development of New Technology Based Firms (NTBFs). To achieve the objectives, four case studies are developed and the empirical results show that the origin of firm network determines the necessity for changing networks, the quality of network member affects the changes but individual difference of technology-based entrepreneur may or may not affect the changes.
References
J. M. Hite and W. S. Hesterly, Evolution of Firm Networks: From Emergence to Early Growth of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 22 (3), 2001, 275-286
A. Al Natsheh, S. A., Gbadegeshin, A. Rimpiläinen and T. Mainela, Technology Based Entrepreneurship: Measurement Technology Perspective, Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, 2 (9), 2013, 26 - 42
H. Humphry, Formation and Survival of New Ventures: A Path from Interpersonal to Inter-organizational Networks, International Small Business Journal, 24(4), 2006, 359 –378
H. Hakanssona and D. Ford, How should companies interact in business networks? Journal of Business Research, Vol. 55, 2002, 133 - 139
J. Johanson and J. Vahlne, The Uppsala Internationalization Process Model Revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 2009, 1411-1431
B. M. Oviatt and P. P. McDougall, Defining International Entrepreneurship and Modeling the Speed of Internationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 29(5), 2005, 537 – 554
J. T. G. Arias, Do networks really foster innovation?, Management Decision, 33 ( 9), 1995, 52 – 56
B. Kenny and J. Fahy, Network resources and international performance of high-tech SMEs, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 18 (3), 2011, 529 – 555
G. S. Mort and J. Weerawardena, Networking capability and international entrepreneurship: How networks function in Australian born global firms, International Marketing Review, 23(5), 2006, 549 – 572
M. Granovetter, Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91(3), 1985, 481 -510
L. Pittaway and M. Rose, Learning and Relationships in Small Firms, International Small Business Journal, 24(3), 2006, 227 – 231
A. Ardichvili, R. Cardozo and S. Ray, A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development, Journal of Business Venturing 18(1), 2003, 105-123
A. M. García-Cabrera and M. G. García-Soto, A Dynamic Model of Technology-based Opportunity Recognition, Journal of Entrepreneurship, 18 (2), 2009, 167 – 190
Y. Wang, A. D. Ellinger and Y. J. Wu, Entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: an empirical study of R&D personnel, Management Decision, 51 (2), 2013, 248-266
J. E. Rauch, Business and Social Networks in International Trade, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXIX,2001, 1177–1203
A. Greve and J. W. Salaff, Social Networks and Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Fall, 2003, 1-23
J. Brüderl and P. Preisendörfer, Network Support and the Success of Newly Founded Businesses, Small Business Economics, 10: 1998, 213 – 225
B. Flyvbjerg, Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research, Qualitative Inquiry, 12 (2), 2006, 219-245
J. C. Iacono, A. Brown and C. Holtham, The use of the Case Study Method in Theory Testing: The Example of Steel e-Marketplaces, The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 9 (1), 2011, 57-65
N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, (London: Sage Publication Inc. 2000)
J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 3rd Eds. (London: Publication Inc., 2009)
R. K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd Edition (USA: Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 2003)
R. K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd Edition (USA: Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 1994)
I. Koskinen, P. Alasuutari and T. Peltonen, Laadulliset menetelmät kauppatieteissä. (Finland: Tampere: Vastapaino, 2005)
T. E. Stuart and O. Sorenson, Social Networks and Entrepreneurship, in Z. J. Acs and D. B. Audretsch (Ed.)), The Handbook of Entrepreneurship, 2nd Ed, (USA: Spring Sciences + Business Media, LLC, 2010)
J. Johanson and L. Mattsson, Internationalisation in Industrial Systems – A Network Approach, in N. Hood and J. Vahlne (Eds) Strategies in Global Competition (New York: Croom-Helm,1988, 287-314)
P. M. Dominguinhos and V. C. Simões, Co-Entrepreneurs in High-Tech Born Globals, Research paper presented at the 8th Uddevalla Symposium and 8th McGill International Entrepreneurship Conference, 2005
