Evaluation on Higher Education Using Data Envelopment Analysis
Keywords:
Higher education, Performance evaluation, Institutional benchmarking¬Abstract
The goal of higher education is to provide students an equal opportunity to access their education for success. With significant competition within the peer group, potential students look for quality, flexibility, and affordability in the educational environment. In addition, the relationship between students and the institution involves a concentrated and more specific set of expectations. In order to improve students’ academic performance and fulfill individual needs, universities aim to enhance the quality of students’ learning environment and academic achievements. The higher education system relies on efficient operation and strategic planning to fulfill students’ needs through an internal emphasis on institutional performance improvement. A study on measuring the performance of higher education is presented. The research was focused on four-year and above, public and not-for-profit private universities in the southern region (AL, AR, KY, LA, MS, OK, TN, and TX) of the United States. The data includes 270 universities which were obtained from the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. This study applied the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach; the purpose is to use a linear programming model to demonstrate a novel benchmarking process of higher education institutional performance and determine an overall benchmark for institutions within each classified group. From the results, suggestions are provided for the general guidance of planners and decision makers in the higher education system.
References
Banker, R.D., Charnes, A.& Cooper, W.W. (1984). Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
Charnes, A. Cooper, W.W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, 2nd Edition. New York: Springer.
Duderstadt, J.J., & Womack, F. W. (2011). The Future of the Public University in America: Beyond the Crossroads. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dyson, R.G., Allen, R., Camanho, A.S., Podinovski, V.V., Sarrico, C.S., & Shale, E.A. (2001). Pitfalls and Protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), 245-259.
Fry, R. (2002). “Latinos in Higher Education: Many Enroll, Too Few Graduate.” A Project of the Per Charitable Trusts and USC Annenberg School for Communication.
Hess, F.M., Schneider, M., Carey, K., & Kelly, A.P. (2009). “Diplomas and Dropouts: Which Colleges Actually Graduate Their Students (and Which Don’t),” A Project of the American Enterprise institute.
Liu, W., & Farris, A. (2009). “A Multi-outcome Model for Kaizen Event Team Performance Analysis using Data Envelopment Analysis,” Proceedings of the 2009 Industrial Engineering Research Conference, May 30–June 3, Miami, Florida, CD-ROM.
Liu, C., & Liu, W. (2010). “Performance Evaluation on Private Higher Education Using Data Envelopment Analysis,” Proceedings of the 2010 Industrial Engineering Research Conference, June 5–9, Cancun, Mexico, CD-ROM.
Paradi, J.C., Smith, S, & Schaffnit-Chatterjee, C. (2002). Knowledge Worker Performance Analysis Using DEA: An Application to Engineering Design Teams at Bell Canada. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(1), 161-172.
Ragsdale, C.T. (2015). Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Practical Introduction to Management Science (7th ed). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
Reider, R.. (2001). Improving the Economy, Efficiency, and Effectiveness of Not-for-Profits. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Sharma, Y. (2009). Expansion of Private Higher Education. University World News (12 July 2000).
Stolk, C.V., Tiessen, J., Clift, J., and Levitt, R. (2007). “Student Retention in Higher Education Courses,” The RAND Corporation Technical Report Series.
U.S. College Drop-out Rate Sparks Concern: Educators Turn Attention to Getting Students All the Way to Graduation. U.S. News, (15, November 2005).
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Digest of Education Statistics, 2014.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics – National Center for Education Statistics, 2014.
Zhu, J. (2003). Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.