The Benefits of Formula Instruction in Enhancing EAP Learners’ Academic Writing Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17722/jell.v2i1.31Keywords:
Teaching Academic Formulas, Academic Language, Academic Writing PerformanceAbstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the benefit of direct instruction of academic formulas (DIAF) on the subjects’ academic writing performance. Two intact groups of Diploma in Computer Science students assigned as the experimental and control groups participated in the study. Each group consists of forty mixed ability ESL learners who were enrolled in an academic writing course. DIAF was incorporated into the academic writing course employing a process-oriented writing approach and was conducted over six weeks out of the fourteen-week semester. Pre and post academic essay writing (AEW) tests were utilized for quantitative data collection while focus group interview was utilized for collecting the qualitative data. This paper discusses the results of the study by focusing on the effects of DIAF on learners from different proficiency level.
References
Al-Zahrani, M. S. (1998). Knowledge of English lexical collocations among male Saudi college students majoring in English at a Saudi university (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9825581).
Bailey, A. L., & Heritage, H. M. (2008). Formative assessment for literacy, grades K-6: Building reading and academic language skills across the curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 263-286.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405.
Boers, F. & Lindstromberg, S. (2012). Experimental and Intervention Studies on Formulaic Sequences in a Second Language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 83-110.
Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H. & Demecheleer, H. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: putting a lexical approach to the test. Language Teaching Research, 10, 245-261.
Brown, H.D.(2004). Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices.NY. Longman.
Coffin, C., Curry, M. J., Goodman, S., Hewings, A., Lilis, T. M., & Swann, J. (2003). Teaching Academic Writing : A toolkit for higher education. London: Routledge.
Conrad, S. (2008). Writing Myth 6: Corpus-based research is too complicated to be useful for writing teachers. In J. Reid (Ed.), Myths about teaching writing (pp.115-139). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Coxhead, A. (2008). Phraseology and English for Academic Purposes: Challenges and Opportunities. In F. Meunier and S. Granger (Eds.), Phraseology in language learning and teaching (pp. 149-161). Amsterdam. John Benjamins.
Creswell, J.W. & Plano Clark, V.L. (2008). The Mixed Methods Reader. London: Sage Publication Ltd.
Durrant, P. & N. Schmitt (2010). Adult learners’ retention of collocations from exposure. Second Language Research, 26(2), 163-188.
Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91–126.
Ellis, N. C., & Schmidt, R. (1998). Rules or associations in the acquisition of morphology? The frequency by regularity interaction in human and PDP learning of morphosyntax. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13.2/3, 307-336.
Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text, 20, 29–62.
Foster, P. (2001). Rules and routines: a consideration of their role in task-based language production of native and non-native speakers. In Bygate, M.,Skehan, P. and Swain, M., (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp.75–93). Harlow, UK: Longman.
Granger, S. (2011) From phraseology to pedagogy: Challenges and prospects. In T. Herbst, S. Schüller and Uhrig, P. (eds) (2011). The Phraseological View of Language. A tribute to John Sinclair. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 123-146.
Hawkey, R., & Barker, F. (2004). Developing a common scale for the assessment ofwriting. Assessing Writing, 9, 122-159.
Hyland, K. (2012). Bundles in Academic Discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32,150-169.
Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching Academic ESL Writing: Practical Techniques in Vocabulary and Grammar. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical Priming: A new theory of words and language. New York: Routledge.
Howarth, P. (1998). Phraseology and second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 19, 22–44.
Jamian, L. S., Sidhu, G. K., & Muzafar, M. (2008). Assessing UiTM TESL Students' Knowledge of Vocabulary. Asian Journal of University Education, 4(2), 79-100.
Kelley, M. J. (2008). The impact of weblogs on the Affective states and academic writing of l2 undergraduates. Unpublished PhD. Thesis. The Faculty of the Curry School of Education University of Virgina, U.S.A.
Kennedy, C, & Thorpe, D. (2007). A corpus-based investigation of linguistic responses to an IELTS academic writing task. In L. Taylor & P. Falvey (Eds.), Studies inLanguage Testing (Vol. 19 IELTS Collected Papers, pp. 316-377).
Keshavarz, M. H., & Salimi, H. (2007). Collocational competence and cloze test performance: A study of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17, 81-92.
Kozlowski, A., & Seymour, L. (2003). The importance of Collocation in English Language Teaching. Contact, 29(3), 41-49.
Leibowitz, B., Goodman, K., Hannon, P. & Parkerson, A. (1997). The role of a writing centre in increasing access to academic discourse in a multilingual university. Teaching in Higher Education. 2 (1), 5-19.
Lewis, M. (2000). Teaching Collocation. Further Development in the Lexical Approach. Boston: Thomson Heinle.
Mathai, J., Jamian, L.S.& Nair, S. (2004) Assessing Malaysian University Students’ English Vocabulary Knowledge. In Wilaiwan Khanittanan & Paul Sidwell, eds. SEALSXIV: papers from the 14th meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (2004), Volume 1. Canberra, Pacific Linguistics, 2008, pp.219-237.
Micheal, G. R. D., Dhillon, P. K., Jaafar, H. H., Umadevi, S., Askandar, R., Ghafar, N., et al. (2010).EAP Crossing Borders. Petaling Jaya, Malaysia: Pearson Longman.
Mokhtar, A. A. (2010). Achieving Native-like English Lexical Knowledge: The Non-native Story. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(4), 343-352.
Nadarajan, S. (2011). The Challenges of Getting L2 Learners to Use Academic Words in their Writings. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching , 8(2) 184–200.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ohlrogge, A. (2008). Academic vocabulary at the word and formula level: An examination of test taker discourse. Unpublished Thesis. Michigan State University.
Ohlrogge, A. (2009). Formulaic expressions in intermediate EFL writing assessment. In R. Corrigan, A. Moravcsik, H. Ouali, & K. M. Wheatley (Eds.) Formulaic Language; Vol 2. Acquisition, loss, psychological reality , and functional explanations (pp/ 387-404). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
O'Farrell, C. (2005). The write approach: Integrating writing activities into your teaching. In G. O’Neill, S. Moore & B. McMullin (Eds.), Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching. Retrieved from: http://www.aishe.org/readings/2005-1.
Rastle, K. (2007). Visual word recognition. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp.71-87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rayson, P. (2008). From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 519-549.
Roever, C. (2012). What learners get for free: learning of routine formulae in ESL and EFL environments. ELT Journal, 66, 10–21.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11, 129-158.
Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 13, 206-226.
Schmidt, R. (2001).Attention.In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 95, 26-43.
Schoonen, R., Van Gelderen, A., Stoel, R., Hulstijn, J., De Glopper, K. (2011). Modeling the development of L1 and EFL writing proficiency of secondary-school students. Language Learning, 6 (1), 31-79.
Seesink, M. T. d. N. (2007). Using Blended Instruction to Teach Academic Vocabulary Collocations: A Case Study. Unpublished PhD thesis, West Virginia University, USA. Retrieved from: https://eidr.wvu.edu/files/4996/Neves_Seesink_MT_dissertation.pdf
Siik, S. C. (2006). The teaching of lexical collocations and its effects on the quality of essays and knowledge of collocations among students of Program Persediaan Ijazah Sarjana Muda Pendidikan of Institut Perguruan Batu Lintang Kuching. Unpublished Master Thesis. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Sekudai Johor Bharu.
Simpson-Vlach, R., & Ellis, N. C. (2010). An Academic Formula List: New Methods in Phraseology Research. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 487-512. Retrieved from http//:www.applij.oxfordjournals.org
Sinclair, J. & Renouf, A. (1988). A lexical syllabus for language learning. In R. Carter & M. McCarthy. Vocabulary and language teaching (pp.140-158). London: Longman.
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Singleton, D. M. (2000). Language and the lexicon: An introduction. London: Oxford University Press.
Snow, C.E., & Uccelli, P. (2009). The challenge of academic language. In D.R. Olson, & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp.112). Cambridge, New York.: Cambridge University Press.
Speelman, C.P. & Kirsner, K. (2005). Beyond the learning curve: The construction of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C. (2011). Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning, 61, 569–613.
Willis, D. (2003). Rules, Pattern and Words. Grammar and Lexis in English Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wood, D. (2010). Formulaic language and second language speech fluency: Background,evidence and applications. London: Continuum.
Wray, A. & Perkins, M. (2000). (second author: Mick Perkins): The functions of formulaic language: an integrated model. [286kB] Language & Communication 20 (1): 1-28.
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic Language and Lexicon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Yunus, .K. & Awab, S. (2011).Collocational Competence among Malaysian Undergraduate Law Students. Malaysian Journal Of ELT Research, 7(1), 151-202. Retrieved from: www.melta.org.my
Zhang, X. (1993). English Collocations and Their Effect on the Writing of Native and Non- native College Freshmen. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Indiana university of Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Journal of English Language and Literature
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
