The Effect of Teacher Talk Modifications on Second Language Learners’ Comprehension and Acquisition

Authors

  • Nouroddin Yousofi PhD in TEFL, Assistant Professor at Razi University, Iran.
  • Khosro Bahramlou Student of PhD Degree in TEFL, Razi University, Iran.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17722/jell.v2i1.30

Keywords:

Pre-modified input, Interactionally modified input, Modification of information structure

Abstract

In this review of literature, we have explored the effect of pre-modified input, interactionally modified input, and modification of information structure on the comprehension and acquisition of second language (L2) learners. While the effect of modifications on comprehension is evident, the same cannot be said of acquisition. Some studies support the effect of modifications on acquisition, yet others shed doubts on the value of modifications in terms of promoting internalization of language knowledge.

Author Biographies

Nouroddin Yousofi, PhD in TEFL, Assistant Professor at Razi University, Iran.

Assistant Professor, Department of Literature and Humanities,

Khosro Bahramlou, Student of PhD Degree in TEFL, Razi University, Iran.

Department of Literature and Humanities,

PhD Student

References

Andersen, A. & Lynch, T. (1988). Listening. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Aston, G. (1986). Troubleshooting in interaction with learners: The more the merrier? Applied Linguistics 7, 128-143.

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Longman.

Cervantes, R. & Gainer, G. (1992). The effects of syntactic simplification and repetition on listening comprehension. TESOL Quarterly 26, 767-770.

Chaudron, C. (1983). Simplification of input: Topic reinstatements and their effects on L2 learners’ recognition and recall. TESOL Quarterly 17, 437-458.

Chiang, C. S. & Dunkel, P. (1992). The effect of speech modification, prior knowledge and listening proficiency on EFL lecture learning. TESOL Quarterly 26, 345-374.

Ellis, R. (1990). Instructed second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (1995). Modified oral input and the acquisition of word meanings. Applied Linguistics 16, 409-441.

Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y. & Yamazaki, A. (1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language Learning 44, 449-491.

Gass, S. & Varonis, E. (1994). Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16, 283-302.

Grifith, R. (1990). Speech rate and NNS comprehension: a preliminary study. Language Learning 40, 311-336.

Li, Y., Wang, Q. & Xu, S. (2005). The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on second language reading comprehension: An exploratory study. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 2, 45-74.

Long, M. & Ross, S. (1993). Modifications that preserve language and content. In M. Tickoo (Ed.), Simplification theory and application (pp. 29-52). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.

Lynch, T. (1996). Communication in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mackey, A. & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal 82, 339-356.

Moradian, M. R., Naserpoor, A. & Tamri, M. S. (2013). The effects of lexical simplification and elaboration of ESP texts on Iranian EFL university students’ reading comprehension. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Research 2(6), 332-338.

O'Donnell, M. (2009). Finding middle ground in second language reading: Pedagogic modifications that increase comprehensibility and vocabulary acquisition while preserving authentic text features. The Modern Language Journal 93, 512–533.

Osborne, D. (1999). Teacher-talk: A sociolinguistic variable. English Teaching Forum 37, 10-13.

Pica, T. (1991). Classroom interaction, negotiation and comprehension: Redefining relationships. System 19, 437-452.

Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, process, and outcomes? Language Learning 44, 493-527.

Pica, T., Young, R. & Doughty, C. (1987). The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly 21, 737-758.

Sharwood Smith, M. (1986). Comprehension vs. acquisition: Two ways of processing input. Applied Linguistics 7, 239-256.

Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal 82, 320-337.

Wells, G. (1985). Language development in the pre-school years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

White, L. (1987). Against comprehensible input: The input hypothesis and the development of second-language competence. Applied Linguistics 8, 95-110.

Yano, Y., Long, M. & Ross, S. (1994). The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning 44, 189–219.

Downloads

Published

2014-08-30

How to Cite

Yousofi, N. and Bahramlou, K. (2014) “The Effect of Teacher Talk Modifications on Second Language Learners’ Comprehension and Acquisition”, Journal of English Language and Literature (ISSN: 2368-2132), 2(1), pp. 154–160. doi: 10.17722/jell.v2i1.30.