Nora Helmer in Ibsen’s A Doll’s House: A Feminist concern in English Literature

Authors

  • Azmi Azam Anglia Ruskin University Faculty of Art, Law and Social Science Department of English, Communication, Film and Media

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17722/jell.v1i1.3

Keywords:

Feminism, Individuality, Self-Respect, Orthodoxy, Patriarchy, Harassment, Womanhood

Abstract

Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll’s House is a very controversial work of literature as it provokes the concept of new women and feminism. Nora’s leaving the household for the name of self-respect is widely debated and has been marked as the first mutinous effort of female individuals against male chauvinist mentalities. The article aims to explore Nora’s mentality and the discussion of critics regarding female liberty. It also sets to find out whether Nora’s decision is acceptable under the social conventionality or her boldness throws her into more devastating situations. Textual references are given with the statements of other critics. A short comparative discussion is also presented to elucidate the concept of feminism and Ibsen’s attitude towards womanhood.

References

Bryan, G.B. 1984. An Ibsen Companion.London: Greenwood press.

Chanter, T., 2006. Gender: Key Concepts in Philosophy. Lndon: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Mcleish, K. and Mulrine, S. trans. 2005. Ibsen Three Plays. London: Nick Horn Books.

McFarlane, J., ed., 1994. The Cambridge Companion to Ibsen. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

Tornqvist, E., 1995. Ibsen: A Doll’s House. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

Templeton, J., 2001. Ibsen’s Women. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

Ibsen, H., A Doll’s House. In Mcguinness, F., ed. 1996. Henrik Ibsen: A Doll’s House. London: Faber and Faber.

McFarlane, J., 1989. Ibsen and Meaning. Oslo: Norvik Press.

Chamberlain, J.S., 1982. Ibsen: The Open Vision. London: Athlone.

Theoharis, T.C., 1999. Ibsen’s Drama. London: Macmillan.

Mandel, S., ed.,.1985. Ibsen’s Heroines.Yew York: Limelight.

Meyer, M., ed., 1990. Ibsen Plyas: Two. London: Methuen.

Lenz, C.R.S; Greene, G., and Neely, C.T., eds., 1983. The Woman’s Part: Feminist Criticism of Shakespeare. Chicago: University of Illinois.

Massai.,S., ed. 2005. World-Wide Shakespeares: Local Appreciation in film and performance. London: Routledge.

McDonald, R., ed. 2011. Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory 1945-2000. London: Blackwell.

Mitchell, J., and Oakley, A., 1994. What is Feminism?. London: Blackwell.

Summers, A., 2000. Female Lives, Moral States. London: Threshold press.

Ledger, S., 1997. The New Women. Manchester: Manchester University press.

Perkin, J., 1993. Victorian Women. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

Levine, P. 1994. Victorian Feminism:1850-1900. Florida: University Press of Florida.

Apetrei, S., 2010. Women, Feminism and Religion in Early Enlightenment England. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

Kelly, J., 1984. Women, History and Theory. Chikago: University Press of Chicago.

Jones, V.,1991. Women in the Eighteenth Century. London: Routledge.

Swindells, J., 1985. Victorian Writing & Working Women. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Downloads

Published

2014-02-28

How to Cite

Azam, A. (2014) “Nora Helmer in Ibsen’s A Doll’s House: A Feminist concern in English Literature”, Journal of English Language and Literature (ISSN: 2368-2132), 1(1), pp. 13–17. doi: 10.17722/jell.v1i1.3.