The effect of peer response groups on EFL college writing students' perceived peer social support
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17722/jell.v2i1.28Keywords:
collaborative learning, peer response, social support, writingAbstract
This article reports the findings of a quasi-experimental study that extended over two consecutive semesters to gauge the effect of collaborative learning activities within peer response groups on 42 Saudi subjects’ perceived peer social support. Results show that many subjects experienced poor social and behavioral skills and insufficient peer acceptance that negatively affected their social competence. Most students worked to maintain group harmony during discussion interactions by avoiding making direct corrections to their peer’s drafts or giving straightforward suggestions to improve their compositions. Results of the study suggest that the impact of group work remains limited in the Saudi educational context which indicates a need for further research on the nature of relationship between group work and the prevailing cultural norms in this particular educational setting.
References
Alqurashi, F., 2005. Computer supported collaborative learning in composition classrooms in Saudi Arabia. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Ball State University, Muncie.
Baker, E. L., Hope, L., & Karandjeff, K. (2009). Contextualized teaching and learning: A faculty primer. The RP Group Center for Student Success. Retrieved from http://www.cccbsi.org/Websites/basicskills/Images/CTL.pdf
Bandura, A. 1996. Multifacted Impact of Self-Efficacy Beliefs on Academic Functioning. Child Development 67, 1206-1222.
Bracey, G.W. 1994. Achievement in collaborative learning. Phi Delta Kappan 76, 254-255.
Bruffee, K. A. 1984. Collaborative learning and the conversation of mankind. College English 46, 635-652.
Bygate, M. 2000. Introduction. Language Teaching Research 4, 185-192.
Carson J. G. & Nelson, G. L., 1996. Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing 5, 1-19.
Chapman, O. 2004. Facilitating peer interactions in learning mathematics: Teachers’ practical knowledge. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 191–198. Available at:
http://www.emis.de/proceedings/PME28/RR/RR088_Chapman.pdf
Davydov, V. V. & Kerr, S. T. 1995. The Influence of L. S. Vygotsky on Education Theory, Research, and Practice. Educational Researcher 24, 12-21.
Driscoll, M. P. 2000. Psychology of learning for instruction. 2nd ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58.
Faigley, L. 1985. Nonacademic writing: The social perspective. In: Odell, L. & D. Goswami, (Eds.), Writing in Nonacademic Settings. (pp. 231-340). New York: Guilford Press.
Feden, P. & Vogel, R., 2006. Education. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Ge, X. & Land, S. M., 2003. Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development 51, 21-38.
Ghaith, G. M. 2002. The relationship between cooperative learning, perception of social support, and academic achievement. System 30, 263-273.
Goodsell, A., Mather, M. & Tinto, V. 1992. Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education. The Pennsylvania State University: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching Learning & Assessment (NCTLA).
Gordy, M. 1996. Social Support and Medical Care. Paper presented at the "Internet for Doctors" conference. Geneva, (May 9th). Retrieved from:
http://www.hon.ch/Library/papers/GORDY.html
Greeno, J. G. 2006. Learning in activity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 79-96). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Gunawardena, C. N. & Zittle, F. 1997. Social Presence as a Predictor of Satisfaction within a Computer Mediated Conferencing Environment. American Journal of Distance Education 11, 8-25.
Hackathorna, J., Solomonb, E. D., Blankmeyerb, K. L., Tennialb, R. E., & Garczynskib, A. M. 2011. Learning by Doing: An Empirical Study of Active Teaching Techniques. Journal of Effective Teaching, 11(2), 40-54.
Hall, M. 2009. The Politics of Peer Response. The Writing Instructor. Retrieved from:
http://www.writinginstructor.com/hall
Hofstede, G. 1990. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
Hodson, D. & Hodson, J. 1998. From constructivism to social constructivism: a Vygotskian perspective on teaching and learning science. School Science Review 79, 33-41.
Hundley, R .J. & Cohen, R. 1999. Children's Relationships with Classmates: A Comprehensive Analysis of Friendship Nominations and Liking. Child Study Journal 29, 233-246.
Hymel, S., Rubin, K. H., Rowden, L. & LeMare, L. 1990. Children’s peer relationships longitudinal prediction of internalizing and externalizing problems from middle to late childhood. Child Development 61, 2004–2021.
Jarboe, S. 1996. Procedures for enhancing group decision making. In: Hirokawa, B. & M. Poole (Eds.), Communication and Group Decision Making (pp. 345-383). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. & Andesron, D. 1983. Social interdependence and classroom climate. Journal of Psychology 114, 135-142.
John-Steiner, V. & Mahn, H. 1996. Sociocultural Approaches to Learning and Development: A Vygotskian Framework. Educational Psychologist 31, 191-206.
Jouhari, A. 1996. A Process Approach for Teaching English Composition at a Saudi University: 6 Case Studies. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA.
LeBaron, M. 2003. Communication Tools for Understanding Cultural Differences. Available at: http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/communicationtools
Legge, A.L. 1980. Small groups in college writing classes: Why and how. Eric Document # 204 803.
Levine, A., Oded, B., Connor, U., & Asons, I. 2002. Variation in EFL-ESL Peer Response. TESL-EJ 6. Available at: http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ej23/a1.html
Li Wai Shing, J. 1992. A Process Approach to Feedback in Writing. Perspectives 4, 47-65. Available at: http://sunzi1.lib.hku.hk/hkjo/view/10/1000038.pdf
Lo, R. 1996. A possible approach to improve teaching of writing. TESL Reporter 29, 10-20.
Nelson, C. E. 1994. Critical thinking and collaborative learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 59, 45-58.
Ogbu, J. U., 1995. Cultural problems in minority education: their interpretations and consequences-part two: case studies. The Urban Review 27, 271–297.
Palloff, R., Pratt, K., 1999. Building learning communities in cyberspace. Josey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
"Peer acceptance." Encyclopaedia of Children’s Health. 2009. Available at: http://www.healthofchildren.com/P/Peer-Acceptance.html
Reber A. & Reber, E. 2001. Penguin dictionary of psychology. London: Penguin Books.
Rogoff, B. 1994. Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity 1, 209-229.
Social competence. 2009. In Encyclopedia of Children’s Health. Available at: http://www.healthofchildren.com/S/Social-Competence.html
Scholten, A. 2004. Increase Your Social Support. Available at: http://www.mbmc.org/healthgate/GetHGContent.aspx?token=9c315661-83b7-472d-a7ab-bc8582171f86&chunkiid=25388
Smith, B. L. & MacGregor, J. T. 1992. What is Collaborative Learning? In: Goodsell, A., Maher, M., Tinto, V., Smith B. L. & J, MacGregor. (Eds.), Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education. The National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment (pp. 9-22). University Park: The Pennsylvania State University: National Center for Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment.
Swain, M. 1995. Three functions of output in second language learning. In. G. Cook & G. Seidhofer (Eds.), Principles and practices in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Terry, M. 2006. The Importance of Interpersonal Relations in Adult Literacy Programs. Educational Research Quarterly 30, 31-44.
Tozer, S. E., Violas, P. C. & Senese, G. B. 1995. School and Society: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Triandis H. C. 1995. Individualism and collectivism. Boulder: Westview.
Van Den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. 2006. Design principles and outcomes of peer assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 341-356.
Van der Linden, J, Erkens, G., Schmidt, H. & Renshaw, P. 2000. Collaborative Learning. In: Simons, R. J., Van der Linden, J. & T. Duffy (Eds.), New learning (pp. 37-54). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Vygotsky, L. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weltman, D. & Whiteside, M. 2010. Comparing the Effectiveness of Traditional and Active Learning Methods in Business Statistics: Convergence to the Mean. Journal of Statistics Education, 18(1), 1-13.
Wentzel, K. R. 2002. Peer relationships and collaborative learning as contexts for academic enablers. School Psychology Review 31, 366-377.
Yingli, H. & Zhaowen, Q. 2008. Enhancing Social Interaction Task-Oriented Collaborative Learning in an Environment of Computer-Supported. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering 5, 97-100.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Journal of English Language and Literature
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
